Amid speculation surrounding a potential delay in elections, concerns have surfaced regarding proposed amendments to the electoral system in Sri Lanka. Sources close to the President have hinted at hesitancy regarding the election timeline.
The current constitutional mandate stipulates a fixed timeframe for elections. However, recent efforts spearheaded by the President and Justice Minister Wijedasa Rajapaksa to enact substantial changes in electoral procedures have raised eyebrows among election observers.
One proposed amendment seeks to overhaul the method of electing members of Parliament, blending proportional and divisional systems. Under this plan, the total number of MPs remains unchanged, with 160 elected at the constituency level and an additional 65 chosen through proportional representation at provincial and national levels.
Proponents of the amendment, including Justice Minister Wijedasa Rajapaksa, argue that the current electoral system is flawed and advocate for a Senate-style model as a viable alternative.
Despite constitutional mandates dictating the scheduling of presidential elections this year, the government’s push for swift constitutional amendments has sparked controversy. Critics assert that such expedited efforts may serve as a strategy to postpone elections, citing historical precedents and procedural complexities.
Rohana Hettiarachchi of the Pafferal organization cautioned against hastily amending the electoral system, highlighting potential delays stemming from unresolved boundary demarcations and political discord.
Manjula Gajanayake of the Institute of Election Studies condemned the proposed amendments, alleging governmental manipulation and misuse of cabinet authority to consolidate power.
Echoing these sentiments, Pubudu Jayagoda of the Frontline Socialist Party denounced the government’s alleged conspiracy to delay elections, emphasizing the need for comprehensive reforms and adherence to constitutional processes.
