The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) has emphasized that any move to increase the retirement age of judges currently serving in the judiciary is likely to be perceived by the public as an attempt to undermine the independence of the judiciary.
In a letter addressed to President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, the BASL expressed serious concerns over the proposed increase in the retirement age of judges. The Association stated that introducing such a measure without a long-term plan could damage the reputation of both the judiciary and the judges themselves.
The BASL further warned that if the current government proceeds with such a move, it could set a dangerous precedent for future governments to introduce constitutional amendments affecting the judiciary without proper long-term planning.
The Association stressed that judicial independence and public confidence in the judiciary are fundamental pillars of the rule of law and Sri Lanka’s democratic framework. In this regard, it is noted that the judiciary must not only be independent in the strict sense but must also be seen as completely impartial and free from any influence, favouritism, or impropriety.
Accordingly, the Bar Association, in fulfilling its responsibility to safeguard the rule of law and judicial independence, respectfully conveyed its strong opposition to the proposed amendment, stating that it is neither in the interests of the judiciary nor the public.
The BASL therefore urged the President not to proceed with any constitutional amendment aimed at increasing the retirement age of judges, including those serving in the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.
The letter also expressed confidence that the President would give due consideration to the importance of protecting the judiciary’s independence, integrity, dignity, and public trust, which are essential to upholding the rule of law and democratic governance in Sri Lanka.
The full text of the BASL’s letter is reproduced below.
